Paste or upload a meeting transcript and Riktra pulls out candidates — decisions, open questions, proposals, insights. You review them before anything becomes company truth.
Nothing extracted from a meeting is written directly. Ingestion produces proposals like any other path into shared context; see Governed truth.
What is deliberately withheld
Sensitive material — health, pay, judgments about individuals, credentials — is never proposed as company context. It is withheld entirely rather than flagged for review, because a reviewer working through a list is exactly the wrong place to first encounter a colleague’s salary discussion.
This pass is one of the few places where a bug would be genuinely expensive, and it has been one. Swedish inflection defeated a word-boundary pattern during the build, which would have published pay discussion into company context. It is now covered by tests in both languages.
What happens to the transcript
It is kept only until its candidates have been reviewed, then deleted. Riktra is not an archive of what was said; it is a record of what was settled.
If an agent is doing the extraction rather than the built-in pipeline, the distinction worth encoding is decided versus discussed:
“We should maybe use Jira” is not a decision, and an agent left to its own judgment will often record it as one.